Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Clement Chidekh vs Martin Damm Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Chidekh vs Damm analysis and find out who is favored!
Clement Chidekh vs Martin Damm Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Chidekh 2 - 0 Damm
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Chidekh has won 50.72% of points on their second serve, while Damm has won 48.43%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Chidekh, in recent form, has won 57.06% of their opponent's second serve points, while Damm has won 45.41%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.69% and 26.31% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Chidekh has saved 59.76% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Damm has saved 70.69% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Chidekh has won 67.65% of matches played (W/L 46/ 22), with Damm winning 65.33% (W/L 49/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Chidekh has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 71% (W/L 60/ 24), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2). Damm has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 63/ 40), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 42/ 41).
- Player level: In the last year, Chidekh has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 72.22% of matches (W/L 26/ 10), where as Damm has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 59.57% of matches (W/L 28/ 19). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Chidekh winning 2 times and Damm being victorious 0 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Chidekh winning 4 and Damm winning 2. The last match between Chidekh and Damm was at the Prague Challenger, 08-05-2024, First, Clay with Clement Chidekh getting the victory 6-4 5-7 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:27:49.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Chidekh and Damm have played a deciding set 2 times, with Chidekh winning 2 times and Damm 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Chidekh winning 0, and Damm 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Chidekh has played against opponents with an average rank of 286.99 while Damm has played against players with an average rank of 265.37.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Chidekh has won 74% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Damm has won 57% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Chidekh has converted 50.66% of breakpoint opportunities, and Damm has converted 33.82% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
274
Rank
265
High
23
Age
Plays
2
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
180
Rank
175
High
20
Age
Plays
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
Form
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
68% (119-56)
Career Total W/L
57% (135-103)
72% (36-14)
YTD W/L
52% (14-13)
$6,035
Career Prize Money
$107,985
3
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Clement Chidekh vs Martin Damm For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Chidekh VS Damm
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Clement Chidekh | Martin Damm |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 2 |
| Games Won | 36 | 29 |
| Aces (Total) | 14 | 40 |
| DFs Total | 10 | 13 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:27:49 | 2:27:49 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (135/214) | 57% (120/209) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 74% (100/135) | 71% (85/120) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 51% (40/79) | 49% (44/89) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 47% (8/17) | 20% (4/20) |
| Return Points W% | 38% (80/209) | 35% (74/214) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 5-7 6-3 |
Stats 
Clement Chidekh
Player
Martin Damm
56%
(
61 of
109)
1st Serve %
53%
(
49 of
92)
5
Aces
9
9
Double Faults
8
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
48%
(
23 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
39%
(
43 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
92)
103
Total Points Won
98
|
||||
| 6-7(3) 6-3 7-5 |
Stats
Clement Chidekh
Player
Martin Damm
70%
(
74 of
105)
1st Serve %
61%
(
71 of
117)
9
Aces
31
1
Double Faults
5
77%
(
57 of
74)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
49 of
71)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
31 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
43 of
117)
117
Total Points Won
105
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Clement Chidekh | Martin Damm |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 72% (36/14) | 52% (14/13) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 64% (75/42) | 48% (31/33) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (590/484) | 49% (333/340) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 100% (1/0) | 60% (6/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 54% (7/6) | 17% (1/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 82% (27/6) | 64% (7/4) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.21 | 1.11 |
| Aces Total | 112 | 365 |
| DFs per game | 0.3 | 0.37 |
| DFs Total | 159 | 121 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:40:51 | 1:49:46 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 295.7 | 325.7 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (2060/3381) | 59% (1283/2175) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (1401/2060) | 77% (992/1283) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (670/1321) | 48% (432/892) |
| BPs Won% Total | 51% (192/379) | 34% (46/136) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (1508/3470) | 33% (688/2078) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 33% (1/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 73% (19/7) | 55% (11/9) |
| Futures W/L | 77% (17/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 71% (35/49) | 50% (13/26) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 36% (4/11) | 48% (10/21) |
| Deciding Set W% | 78% (14/18) | 64% (7/11) |
| 1st set W, W | 94% (32/30) | 83% (12/10) |
| 1st set W, L | 6% (32/2) | 17% (12/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (18/6) | 20% (15/3) |
Clement Chidekh Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Clement Chidekh
Player
Alejo Sanchez Quilez
52%
(
34 of
65)
1st Serve %
49%
(
37 of
75)
4
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
2
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
36 of
75)
77
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Clement Chidekh
74%
(
70 of
94)
1st Serve %
68%
(
67 of
99)
9
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
10
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
44 of
67)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
38%
(
36 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
99)
98
Total Points Won
95
|
2-6 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Clement Chidekh
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve %
63%
(
26 of
41)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
51
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Clement Chidekh
Player
Blake Mott
54%
(
35 of
65)
1st Serve %
70%
(
54 of
77)
2
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
9
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
37 of
54)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
77)
75
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Clement Chidekh
41%
(
17 of
41)
1st Serve %
69%
(
33 of
48)
5
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
76%
(
13 of
17)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marco Cecchinato
Player
Clement Chidekh
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Clement Chidekh
Player
Anas Bennour Dit Sahli
54%
(
43 of
79)
1st Serve %
43%
(
30 of
69)
0
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
14
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
11 of
39)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
31 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
39 of
69)
87
Total Points Won
61
|
6-0 5-7 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Toby Alex Kodat
Player
Clement Chidekh
51%
(
40 of
79)
1st Serve %
52%
(
38 of
73)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
7
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
33 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
73)
83
Total Points Won
69
|
6-2 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clement Chidekh
Player
Martin Damm
56%
(
61 of
109)
1st Serve %
53%
(
49 of
92)
5
Aces
9
9
Double Faults
8
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
48%
(
23 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
39%
(
43 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
92)
103
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Clement Chidekh
Player
Robert Strombachs
47%
(
26 of
55)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
54%
(
14 of
26)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
40%
(
22 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
44
|
0-6 6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Martin Damm Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Filip Krajinovic
Player
Martin Damm
67%
(
61 of
91)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
82)
9
Aces
19
0
Double Faults
5
75%
(
46 of
61)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
36 of
48)
67%
(
20 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
27%
(
25 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
30 of
82)
96
Total Points Won
77
|
6-7(2) 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clement Chidekh
Player
Martin Damm
56%
(
61 of
109)
1st Serve %
53%
(
49 of
92)
5
Aces
9
9
Double Faults
8
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
48%
(
23 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
39%
(
43 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
92)
103
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Martin Damm
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
83)
8
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
6
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
22 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Martin Damm
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
46%
(
31 of
68)
1
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
7
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
10 of
37)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Damm
Player
Toby Alex Kodat
51%
(
55 of
107)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
94)
17
Aces
7
9
Double Faults
3
78%
(
43 of
55)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
39 of
57)
52%
(
27 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
35%
(
37 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
94)
109
Total Points Won
92
|
6-7(1) 7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Brandon Holt
Player
Martin Damm
63%
(
64 of
102)
1st Serve %
59%
(
54 of
91)
9
Aces
13
0
Double Faults
7
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
39 of
54)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
39%
(
40 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
91)
98
Total Points Won
95
|
7-5 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Christopher O'Connell
Player
Martin Damm
65%
(
59 of
91)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
13
Aces
18
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
48 of
59)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
40 of
49)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
30%
(
27 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
21 of
74)
85
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(5) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martin Damm
Player
Tommy Paul
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
59%
(
26 of
44)
10
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
0%
(
0 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
14 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
15 of
44)
43
Total Points Won
43
|
4-6 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Damm
Player
Zhizhen Zhang
60%
(
50 of
83)
1st Serve %
72%
(
63 of
87)
14
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
43 of
63)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
27 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
32 of
87)
88
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(2) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Bu Yunchaokete
Player
Martin Damm
71%
(
58 of
82)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
90)
13
Aces
13
0
Double Faults
3
79%
(
46 of
58)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
38 of
50)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
8%
(
1 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
23 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
33 of
90)
92
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(7) 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
view more
Chidekh Vs Damm Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Chidekh are available here and Damm photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Clement Chidekh
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
